Reflections on CNMAC11 – number three
I used to say that it wasn’t worth going to a Christian conference unless you got a cooked breakfast. Not only was it a shallow thing to say – but also it clearly doesn’t apply to a day conference such as CNMAC. These days I would say it isn’t worth going to a conference unless my intellect is shocked, my creativity is sparked, or my network is expanded. CNMAC won on all three.
However, there can be no doubt that the intellectual shock element was delivered by this simple phrase:
We should remind ourselves that Christ did not come to make us Christians or to save our souls only, but that he came to redeem us that we might be human in the full sense of the word. (Hans Rookmaaker Art needs no justification, emphasis mine).
Pete Phillips then went on to expand on this, talking about the call from the Trinity as a ‘social creation’ to express our humanity through creativity. In his all too brief analysis of this ‘speculative theology’ he talked about the ongoing presence of God in human creative endeavour.
It was at this point that I left the room, metaphorically speaking. I left Pete at the front talking about the exquisite beauty of a cello recital, and wandered into a kitchen where a young single mother was making appetising food with few resources and brightening up the drab walls with her daughter’s crayoned pictures. From there I went up the garden path onto an allotment where a pensioner was rubbing the soil between finger and thumb to see if it was just right for planting. Both of them, the young mum and the pensioner, looked up at me as I passed and guffawed at the idea that every human was creative. When I muttered under my breath that we could not be fully human without expressing our creativity they looked ready to clout me. Beating a hasty retreat back to the safer environment of the seminar, I resolved to look into this further.
Spurred on by Pete, I have just read Rookmaaker’s paper in full. It has troubled me, stimulated me and reassured me in equal measure. Interestingly, Rookmaaker states that the best metaphor for art is neither preaching nor teaching but plumbing – for it serves its purpose without shouting about its importance. He goes on to say that ‘Plumbers who give great evangelistic talks but let the water leak are not doing their job. They are bad plumbers. It becomes clear that they do not love their neighbour’ . I wonder what my companions in the allotment and the kitchen would have thought of that?
Like Peter Phillips, and like Hans Rookmaaker before him, I believe that the creative gene is our inheritance from God. The desire to create – to make something from nothing and something better from something drab, is a priceless gift. It stirs the pool of humankind – ruffling its waters and sending off a myriad unexpected reflections. It is that same gene which fuels the pursuit of speculative theology – and long may it do so!
Image: wikimedia commons



.






9 comments
Comments feed for this article
October 18, 2011 at 9:49 am
Pam Smith
I love this interpretation of creativity as an intrinsic part of us as part of Creation.
I attended CNMAC last year and I was a long distance participant via Twitter this year. Looking at it via Twitter – which I accept is not at all the same as being there – I was a bit disturbed by an apparent emergence of #digicreatives as a distinct identity, which I took to mean people who are doing ‘creative’ things online.
There are of course people doing marvellously creative things online in the more usual definition of ‘creativity’ as ‘artistic creativity’. However, if there was ever a medium that requires ‘plumbing’ it’s the online medium.
By ‘plumbers’ I don’t just mean technical support – though I believe technical support to Christian projects is a distinct and largely unsung calling that is emerging as we explore the potential of the digital environment.I also mean the whole infra strucuture of theological engagement, pastoral care and honest and healthy personal relationships that needs to underpin any Christian venture if we are to walk the walk as well as talk the talk.
This does exist – I am just concerned that, like plumbing, it may become something we only attend to wen it goes wrong!
October 18, 2011 at 9:52 am
preachersa2z
A sound & cautionary note, Pam!
October 18, 2011 at 10:05 am
Neil Chappell
Do you have a link to Hans Rookmaaker’s paper?
October 18, 2011 at 10:15 am
preachersa2z
Link is here: http://www.patrickdodson.net/files/Rookmaaker.pdf
October 18, 2011 at 12:26 pm
@drgeorgemorley
I think Rookmaaker’s point about plumbing is that it is indispensible but modestly invisible – it does not demand our attention. This is a tad sobering for all our narcissism and attention-seeking behaviour in digital space (and everywhere else). For Rookmaaker the meaning of art (creativity) is in love of God and neighbour… so, yes – let’s hear it for the kitchen and the allotment! #digicreatives may need to whoop it up a bit together and offer mutual support and clarification, but for all of us the call to be creative in the image of God is a call to be giving space to the other not demanding it for our self. I think this is hugely challenging in social media which really does invite a lot of self-promotion and googlization…
October 18, 2011 at 12:43 pm
preachersa2z
Sound comments as ever – thank you. Sorely tempted to start a campaign to get “googlization” into common parlance!
October 18, 2011 at 1:56 pm
Pam Smith
I think anyone working online struggles with the tension of self promotion vs promotion of the kingdom. The medium actually *demands* that we promote ourselves in order to get noticed, and there’s no point in working online for the Kingdom if nobody notices, is there?
But are we *all* called to be enormous mustard trees, showing the way God can grow his kingdom? Or are some of us called to be counter cultural, to be the ‘buried treasure’ in the digital world that most people pass by?
How do we maintain the practice of speaking truth in love in a world where things are habitually hyped up as the next big thing until the next next big thing comes along?
Or should we adopt the online practice of labelling our friends and colleagues as ‘awesome’ ‘fantastic’ ‘amazing’ because that’s the context we’re in, and building them up build up the kingdom?
The thing that concerns me most is that Christians are so good at setting up hierarchies and pecking orders, so that people are set aside to do the work of mission on behalf of everyone else. The online medium offers a remarkable opportunity for everyone with a heart for mission to connect with people at whatever level they’re comfortable working.
Yes. let’s recognise excellence and innovation, but please don’t lets create a digital Christian elite and push out everyone else who God is calling to this exciting mission field.
October 19, 2011 at 11:55 am
Art & plumbing – in pursuit of the creative gene – evangelismofthegospelblogs
[...] FROM Evangelism Of The Gospel source http://richardlittledale.wordpress.com/2011/10/18/art-plumbing-in-pursuit-of-the-creative-gene/ Article Continues Below Special Offer "Get Your Message Out Using The Internet!" FREE Webinar [...]
October 22, 2011 at 7:08 am
Church in the streets « Richard Littledale's Preacher's A – Z
[...] discussions on art and its role earlier this week, it would be great to get your reactions on this particular piece of [...]