On hijacking a cathedral
When interviewed on BBC Radio 2 last week Andy Flannagan, Director of the Christian Socialist Movement, was asked ‘what would Jesus do’ about the occupation of the precinct of St Paul’s Cathedral. The interviewer wanted to know whether he would side with the protesters or with those seeking to move them on. With great astuteness Mr Flannagan answered that it never goes well when any political cause seeks to recruit Jesus to their ranks. History bears this out. Slave-owners, emancipators, the architects of apartheid and those who brought it down would all have claimed Jesus as a recruit to their cause. I think Jesus expects us to make our own minds up about these things, rather than pressing him into service as a poster boy. Perhaps a little excursion to the woods might help with this one.
One morning rabbit was awoken by an almighty squeaking and scurrying outside her door. To her enormous surprise, a great crowd of thin and angry little mice had gathered on the ferny forest floor outside her burrow. ‘We are protesting’ they said, ‘those fat cats are making our lives a misery’ . They went on to explain that the fat cats were forever stealing their food, keeping them in a state of fear, and toying with their very lives. Rabbit tutted and furrowed her brow at this. ‘Well stay here for a little while and make your point then’ she said kindly. The mice were overjoyed, and began to organise themselves. Pretty soon rabbit’s front doorstep was a riot of colour and a medley of conversation. Soon, though, things started to get awkward for rabbit. Little piles of mouse food and other things began to litter the mossy floor. It was awkward for her to get in and out, and soon she might have to ask them to leave. The newspapers began to run headlines on ‘the oppression of innocent mice by rodents who should know better’. Others talked of the selfishness and folly of rabbit. Still others began to delve into the history of the forest and look for other examples of rabbit’s misdeeds. And all the while nobody, but nobody,was talking about the fat cats. They didn’t mind, though – they owned the newspapers.
Of course this is a gross simplification of a complex story. There is no desire to belittle a situation which has cost more than one servant of the church his job. However, we must remember that a critique of capitalism has now turned into a debate about the church. Why was BBC Radio 2 talking about WWJD, rather than discussing what the captains of industry have or haven’t done? A moment of kindness on the church’s part has turned into hours of debate about the wrong question.
How do we turn it around again?



.






8 comments
Comments feed for this article
October 29, 2011 at 3:28 pm
Edward Green (@EdwardBGreen)
Great post and echoes very much my thoughts here: http://www.future-shape-of-church.org/?e=76 on transference. Thank you.
October 29, 2011 at 4:01 pm
Pete Phillips
No it’s not about the one moment of kindness but the complete interconnection between the church and the establishment. Corporate Church is the issue. The Church is in danger of losing its spiritual identity.
Pete
October 29, 2011 at 4:13 pm
preachersa2z
Don’t want to tread on any toes, in a ‘disestablished’ church – since the interweaving of church and establishment are surely more complex than I appreciate. However, if it leads to debate on the church’s spiritual identity- must be a good thing, I reckon.
October 29, 2011 at 4:04 pm
How did a critique of capitalism turn into a debate about the church? #occupylsx | eChurch Blog
[...] first is written by Richard Littledale and looks at the dangers of co-opting Jesus to your cause, as well as asking how a critique of [...]
October 29, 2011 at 4:08 pm
Charlie
Your parable would be more accurate if there was a family of rabbits who argued amongst themselves about what to do with the mice, until finally one rabbit was expelled and the rest called in the local cat to sort it out.
Seriously though, is it not a creative thing that there has been this debate? Never mind, what WWJD, the question of what the church ought to do has got people talking about Jesus, as well showing them that the church has a human face. Both of these seem, on balance, to be a good thing.
October 29, 2011 at 4:15 pm
preachersa2z
The danger with parables is always that they lack the finesse of multiple interpretations! That said, I definitely agree with your point about healthy debate of the church’s role. My main concern is that the spotlight has moved away from the original issue raised by the mice/ protesters. Also, I feel a real sadness for those who have felt obliged to resign.
Thanks for your thoughtful comment.
October 30, 2011 at 8:49 am
Alan Wilson
I’ve been fascinated by the way media outlets are fascinated by yet another Church division story, but more fascinated when given opportunity, by teaching of Jesus. Completely agree abt need not to be captured by aby side; what’s interesting about OLSX is that they don’t have an alternative programme, just a desire to debate in a democratised way. All Xns need to do is get stuck into the discussion!
December 1, 2011 at 7:20 am
Polarized Bible study « Richard Littledale's Preacher's A – Z
[...] abuse of power by the civic authorities. With all this going on in the passage, and memories of the St Paul’s debacle fresh in our minds, what did the Bible Study focus on? Jumping off from the story of the [...]